Internal vs. Extenal

Optics, cameras, tents, boots, binoculars, spotting scopes & other gear.
Post Reply
Thunder Head
Spike
Spike
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 9:06 am
Location: N.E. Georgia

Internal vs. Extenal

Post by Thunder Head » Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:03 am

Whats the pros and cons for an internal frame vs. an external frame back pack? I am thinking about getting a Cabelas alaskan for pure meat hauling. The internals seem more popular these days. So i want to hear your thoughts about the different styles.
Have bow will travel !!!

User avatar
sneekeepete
Monster
Monster
Posts: 1757
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:15 pm
Location: Utah

Re: Internal vs. Extenal

Post by sneekeepete » Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:25 am

I prefer an internal frame pack if I am going to be using it daily or for back packing. They just seem to be easier for me to fit comfortably. I think it is because I am a medium framed guy but very lean so I am prone to feel more of the rigid edges that won't conform to my build.
When it comes to hauling heavy loads like your talking about with meat and what not you just can't beat an external frame. They are the ticket for weight and will allow you to pack more weight comfortably than an internal frame because they stay rigid.
Hope that gives your some perspective.
SNEEKEEPETE
OIF Vet.
Sgt Petersen USMC
Colossians 1:27,28

m gardner
Monster
Monster
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:24 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Internal vs. Extenal

Post by m gardner » Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:49 pm

I have both types and use the internal frame for a daily pack and to carry lighter loads. The external frame packs make it easier to carry heavier bulky stuff. You can adjust it higher or lower to suit the balance you need depending on the terrain you're in too. The higher it carries the load the easier it is to walk with lots of weight. I carry it lower when I need balance for rugged terrain but then it tires me more quickly.

User avatar
Tonoonyi
3 point
3 point
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 9:25 am
Location: Central Washington

Re: Internal vs. Extenal

Post by Tonoonyi » Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:32 pm

I prefer the Molle II military for heavy meat loads. It actually works real well for an all around pack as well. It can stand a lot more load than I can carry.
Keep your nose in the wind and your eyes along the skyline.

User avatar
spoofman
Spike
Spike
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah

Re: Internal vs. Extenal

Post by spoofman » Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:04 am

if you want to use one for meat hauling than an external is the way to go. I can carry much more than would ever imagine on one of those compared to an internal. besides the weight is on your hips on not your shoulders as is common with the internals. This helps against fatigue and also helps when time to clean the pack after a haul gets a little messy. Externals are simple to clean where the mess is on the outside instead of on the inside of a pouch.

Post Reply