Cannon or Nikon

Optics, cameras, tents, boots, binoculars, spotting scopes & other gear.
Post Reply
User avatar
DeadI
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2024
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:03 pm
Location: Payson, Utah
Contact:

Cannon or Nikon

Post by DeadI » Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:36 am

I am shoping around for a Digital SLR. Just wondering what the majority prefer out there. Canon, Nikon, Pentax or Sony.
Thanks.
DeadI/Jared
Deadi

User avatar
MuleyMadness
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9997
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: St. George, UT
Contact:

Post by MuleyMadness » Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:24 am

I'd go with a Canon or Nikon. Don't think you can make a bad choice with either one.

I use the Canon Digital Rebel XT myself and am very happy with it.

User avatar
CoopersDesign
2 point
2 point
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Layton, UT
Contact:

Post by CoopersDesign » Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:06 pm

Jared,
I shoot the Canon 30D. I'm sure that nikon is just as good. If your going to shoot wildlife, you need to buy a camera with a conversion factor. The 30D has a 1.6 conversion, this makes my 100-400mm lens a 160-640mm with out any drop in resolution. I don't like shooting with a converter but I have both the 1.4, 2x converters and they do come in handy. This makes the 100-400mm lens a 320-1280mm lens, with the 2x. This fox photo was taken with the 30D at 992mm 1/125sec f11, 400iso thats with the 2x converter. There is another important factor about the 30d, there is virtually no difference in the digital distortion between 100iso-400iso. I only shoot at 400iso, this means: 1. cheaper lens and 2. faster shooting in low light conditions. If you would like any other information, I'd be happy to help. Just drop me an email at: harlan@coopersdesign.com

Hope this helps...

Sincerely,
Harlan Cooper
Cooper's Rugged Design
tel: (801) 721-0115
Attachments
fox-sm.jpg
fox-sm.jpg (150.2 KiB) Viewed 6977 times
Cooper's Rugged Design - Most Trophies Hang on Your Wall, Ours Hang in Your CLOSET...
http://www.coopersdesign.com

Don Fischer
3 point
3 point
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Antelope, Oregon

Post by Don Fischer » Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:37 am

You won't go wrong with Nikon or Cannon either. Probally Pentax, Sigma and other's would be just as well. I use Nikon because I alway's have and my old film lenses work on my D 70. Like my 70-300 and especially my 150-500 lense's for wildlife and animals. The picture of the dog was taken with a film camera, Nikon FG, and scanned into my computer.
Attachments
Digital D 70 Nikon w/70-300 lense
Digital D 70 Nikon w/70-300 lense
Doe #003 re-sized.jpg (231.98 KiB) Viewed 6947 times
Pete on Huns - Nikon FG with 28-200 lense
Pete on Huns - Nikon FG with 28-200 lense
odd ball stuff-sort it out 243.jpg (199.65 KiB) Viewed 6947 times

User avatar
Cvrn
3 point
3 point
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Utah

Post by Cvrn » Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:21 am

Take a look at the Pentax K-10 that is the camera I just bought and for what the camera has and is, I think price for price this is a Superior camera to the others( in this price range)I would definately look at it as well.

This was taken with a inexpensive 70-300
Attachments
Keni's-12-21-(41)-copy.jpg
Keni's-12-21-(41)-copy.jpg (250.91 KiB) Viewed 6922 times

Don Fischer
3 point
3 point
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Antelope, Oregon

Post by Don Fischer » Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:49 pm

Nice photo! What lense was it?

User avatar
Cvrn
3 point
3 point
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Utah

Post by Cvrn » Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:03 pm

It is just a cheap Quanteray.I think it ran me around $200.00

User avatar
bigbuck92
Monster
Monster
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:48 pm
Location: Vernal,UT

Post by bigbuck92 » Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:09 pm

great pics guys!
Image
Cody
Old hunters NEVER die,they just have better camo.

Don Fischer
3 point
3 point
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Antelope, Oregon

Post by Don Fischer » Mon Dec 25, 2006 11:56 pm

Cvrn wrote:It is just a cheap Quanteray.I think it ran me around $200.00
That my friend is supposed to be a Sigma. Good lenses! My understanding is that Sigma, makes all all the Quanteray lenses.

User avatar
Hunter292
2 point
2 point
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: Battle mountain,Nevada

Post by Hunter292 » Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:18 pm

nice pics nice and clear.
Hunter292

Post Reply
cron