swarovski or nikon?

Optics, cameras, tents, boots, binoculars, spotting scopes & other gear.
Nevadahunter
4 point
4 point
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Battle Mountain. Nevada

swarovski or nikon?

Post by Nevadahunter » Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:32 pm

ur suggestion i say swarovski
Attachments
swarovski.jpg
swarovski.jpg (1.01 KiB) Viewed 7042 times
If God Had Intended For Us To Be Vegitarians, Why Did He Make Animals With Meat?
.
.
.
Unless You Haven't Heard..I'm a Pretty Big Deal Around Here.

User avatar
killerbee
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4117
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Oregon

Post by killerbee » Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:07 pm

Well not that nikon are bad optics but-------- there is no comparison!!!!!!!! two complete different quality of optics your talking about. a better comparison would be either SWAROVSKI OR LEICA now your talkin a close comparison.

Nevadahunter
4 point
4 point
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Battle Mountain. Nevada

Post by Nevadahunter » Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:09 pm

swarovski!.....all they way
If God Had Intended For Us To Be Vegitarians, Why Did He Make Animals With Meat?
.
.
.
Unless You Haven't Heard..I'm a Pretty Big Deal Around Here.

User avatar
bigbuck92
Monster
Monster
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:48 pm
Location: Vernal,UT

Post by bigbuck92 » Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:30 pm

swarovski are to friggin expensive. my cheap nikons do just fine
Image
Cody
Old hunters NEVER die,they just have better camo.

Dirtytough
Fawn
Fawn
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:40 pm
Location: Buckley,Wa

Post by Dirtytough » Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:23 pm

Swarovski are the best optics I have ever looked through. Not only are they great optics but my EL's are so much more comfortable compared to any other pair I have tried. My Swarovski 20-60X80 HD spotter is unbelievable. Lots of good optics just choose whats best for you.

User avatar
DeadI
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2024
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:03 pm
Location: Payson, Utah
Contact:

Post by DeadI » Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:27 pm

Agree with killerbee, those two optics are not even in the same catagory it like saying what is your favorite caliber 22 or 30-06, not even closely related.
Deadi

User avatar
Cvrn
3 point
3 point
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:14 am
Location: Utah

Post by Cvrn » Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:29 am

For the price of the Nikon's you cant beat them, as for comparing the two it is not a fair comparison, you need to talk price range per price range.

I have both NIkon and Swaro and the Nikons are a awesome glass for the money but no where near the Quality.

When I am looking with my Nikon Spotter I can tell there is a animal, and when looking with my Swaro I can tell whether it is a Buck or Doe
SNUFF"M

Nevadahunter
4 point
4 point
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:03 pm
Location: Battle Mountain. Nevada

Post by Nevadahunter » Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:30 pm

whatver whats so bad about that comparison ..........we'll have 2 wait and see what the good friend brett says1 [-o< :)
If God Had Intended For Us To Be Vegitarians, Why Did He Make Animals With Meat?
.
.
.
Unless You Haven't Heard..I'm a Pretty Big Deal Around Here.

User avatar
MuleyMadness
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9997
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: St. George, UT
Contact:

Post by MuleyMadness » Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:35 pm

Nevadahunter

You're kidding me right?? You think I'm going to side with you on this one. :)) :))

There is no comparision as already stated. "You get what you pay for" is a good quote here.

I don't own a spotting scope, so I didn't chime in. But I'm smart enough to know a better glass through reading and education.

User avatar
kadejones2
Monster
Monster
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:55 pm
Location: NV

Post by kadejones2 » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:53 pm

well put muleymadness

Post Reply